Please see "Natural Immunity." 

Basically there are two types of immunity - Innate (natural) and Adaptive (acquired). 

This is basic but important.  Innate is the defense that is always on, adaptive is the defense that is either inherited from the mothers or acquired after exposure, and takes several weeks to months to be active and start protecting us. 

If Covid-19 is defeated by an Innate capability, but all the vaccines (but ours) in development utilize Adaptive capabilities, how effective will that be? 

*WE KNOW REMDESIVIR, REGN-COVN-2, THE PHIZER AND ASTRA ZENECA AND OTHER VACCINES ARE 'WRONG' OR AT LEAST ONLY AN IMPARTIAL SOLUTION AND THAT'S WHY THEY ARE NOT WORKING FOR EVERYONE, HAVE SIDE EFFECTS, ETC -- BECAUSE THEY DON'T FIT THE SCENARIO OF THE PANDEMIC.  Our solution fits the FACTS of the pandemic and the pattern of its scope and spread. 

Every vaccine in development but ours, attacks Covid-19 from the ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE. EVERY ONE. 

They are all just singular or partial interventions relying entirely on how God programmed the Adaptive Immune system to interact with the rest of our human systems - biochemical, molecular, and genetic. Specialized, slow to act, extremely targeted, and of only brief, limited duration defenses.  

____

Why this is different from a measles vaccine, or polio vaccine - lifelong immunity:

The Innate Immune system works both as an always-on front- end defense, with 'general' recognizeability of the 'general' parameters of what a virus or bacteria would look like; and as a back-end or secondary Adaptive immune response which also recognizes specific antigens. 

IF THE BASIC INNATE IMMUNITY IS 'BROKEN' OR 'BREACHED' HOWEVER, NO AMOUNT OF SECONDARY ADAPTIVE (specific or acquired, as in an RNA protease-based  or antibody-based  vaccine; or gradual absorption of these new definitions of what is a virus into the innate system memory) CAPABILITY WILL WORK, OR WILL WORK VERY WELL OR LAST VERY LONG. 

Because that's not how our systems were designed. There is inadequate data in my opinion, to fully understand the mechanisms of Covid-19 immunity because the questions I've been asking since March are not asked or those answers shared:

1- It is clear that for at least the first few weeks of initial exposure, 95% of us are spared by our INNATE IMMUNITY RESPONSE. THAT IS THE ONLY LOGICAL EXPLANATION. ANTIBODY RESPONSE REQUIRES AT LEAST A MONTH FOR SOPHISTICATED VIRUSES. 

2 - But what happens after the first month? It is not good to assume anything. Are those 95% 'immune' really immune? Because real immunity would mean the virus is never allowed to attach and activate. People have gotten lazy and started using vaccine to equate to 'immunity.' But it does not. An anti-body or replication-based vaccine only equates to our ability to stop the spread of infection (causing symtoms); NOT OUR ABILITY TO STOP OURSELVES FROM BEING INFECTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. 

THIS IS A KEY DISTINCTION THAT MEDIA DO NOT GET, AND NO ONE IN NIH OR FDA OR CDC ARE ASKING, OR PRESSING FOR ANSWERS TO, IN MY OPINION. Is the virus ATTACHING in asymptomatic people? At what point in the Cov-19 lifecycle does the natural immunity begin?

In individuals where there is not yet time to develop antibodies, what are the real mechanisms involved - are they still ADAPTIVE or are they INNATE?  (t-CELLS are an adaptive response for example, but they are governed by the INNATE CONTROL SYSTEM - in particular, by the element we found missing or the sequences believed broken or compromised by Covd-19)

Is Covid-19 breaking, bypassing, or exploiting our Innate Immune system? A very critical question but one not getting any attention. Just like with cyber, it's important to know the mechanism of the attacker and the flaws in our defenses. 

Is the virus 'breaking' or sneaking through our Innate System? Or have we artificially weakened our Innate Immune system?

If we address cov-19 only from the ADAPTIVE immune perspective the cure will be fleeting and incomplete and there will be no foundational INNATE defense to fall back on. 

Our anti-viral addresses the INNATE IMMUNE deficiency that is indicated in blood results - very low D levels - of just about every Cov-19 mortality. It may not be the ONLY Innate deficiency or missing element, but it is at least the CHIEF one. 

D is the 'master' controller of just about every body system or function that occurs  - it acts as a 'master control' mechanism across biochemical, molecular, and even genetic systems. When present in optimum levels (75 - 100%), D acts on sub-scripts to mitigate even DNA variance or vulnerabilities to eliminate or offset them - as with the weaknesses making black and hispanic persons more vulnerable to Cov-19.

Logically - YES. Because logic dictates that only the INNATE IMMUNE SYSTEM, OR LARGELY THE INNATE IMMUNE SYSTEM, WAS / IS INVOLVED IN EARLIEST PROTECTION AND LONG-LASTING PROTECTION AGAINST COVID-19.

Therefore, strengthening or 'reparing' the INNATE IMMUNE SYSTEM SHOULD LOGICALLY eliminate Cov-19. For everyone. 

95% of us - and almost everyone under age 40 - did not get sick from Covid-19 THE FIRST WEEK. AND THE NEXT 3 WEEKS OF EXPOSURE IN ANY GIVEN NATION. So logically, our INNATE IMMUNITY is protecting 95% of us during initial exposure. And possibly, for the duration of ongoing exposure. 

They miss or ignore the obvious and focus instead on intervention that targets or partially targets the wrong part of the problem. We should solve for the most glaring issues first, then move on to other secondary details. 

_______________________________________

1.   Every vaccine but ours targets Adaptive Immunity. (Fleeting, specialized, not 100% reliable) But that is not the type of  immunity involved in intial protection to Covid-19. 

2.   It is clear however, that  Covid-19 is exploiting or destroying our Innate Immunity. Because of the timing and speed of spread, and the survival of infants and toddlers - who traditionally have weaker immune systems than adults. (Remember the Nestle Baby Formulae scandal? Millions of babies died. Even in third world nations now, or refugee camps, babies are immune to Cov-19.)

3.   None of the vaccines but ours target or strengthen Innate Immunity. They focus on an entirely different area of human response. 

Logically, what is the supporting rationale for this?

4.   As with missile defense  (below), the new vaccines - and NIH, FDA, CDC support  and funding - all focus on less-effective or entirely ineffective, high-risk interventions. BUT THE OBVIOUS INTERVENTION IS TO SIMPLY REPAIR OR STRENGTHEN THE INNATE IMMUNITY FOR EVERYONE. Or at least for those at risk due to impaired Innate Immunity. (low D levels, a few other sbasic deficits to look for, simple blood tests).

5. The seasonal pattern of sars, mers, cov-19 supports this Innate Immunity theory as well, if D is the causative factor or deficit. 

• It also fits the President's recovery; he tans more than anyone. He takes D supplement. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 COMPARISON TO OUR FAILING HYPERSONIC AND NUCLEAR AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS 

Why design a solution for the wrong trigger mechanism? 

We are throwing billions at interceptors to defend against incoming hypersonic - knowing that does't work because they are not  fast or fluid enough, cannot be repleninished quickly enough, and nly work in some situations. Even Iran has bragged about the US missing the real flaw in our own defenses, our navigational system (GPS) and now beidou. Why didn't OUR OWN LEADERS PAY ATTENTION WHEN I OR OTHERS TRIED TO ELEVATE THIS TO THEM, IN 2017, 2018, 2019?? Now  beidou is complete and it is harder to breach enemy incoming navigational systems. 

Like the pandemic. 

_____________________________________

Wouldn't it have been better to stop the enemy missile or uav launches BEFORE THEY LEFT THE GROUND? Rather than waiting til they reach our airspace or allied airspace and trying to shoot them down, in impossible hypersonic trajectory? All we had to do was STOP THEM ACQUIRING THE BASIC GPS (or now Beidou or Galileo) satellite signal they needed to LAUNCH. Or needed to navigate to target. 

But as with our pandemic 'solution' - it was so SIMPLE A STRATEGY OR DISCOVERY AND SO OBVIOUS, THAT IT WAS HARD TO GET OTHERS TO BELIEVE IT. TO BELIEVE THAT THE US WAS DOING SOMETHING SO 'STUPID.' OR ILLOGICAL.

 AS TO LET ENEMIES USE OUR OWN NAVIGATION AGAINST US. And the common response was - 'We can't believe the Army is not taking care of this." 

But it wasn't. Even Lockheed engineers, not trained to think 'systems theory' misssed this. Or didn't care. They made billions building satellites that let anyone in, and they had no sow to intercept the signals being acquired by enemy or terrorist gps receiver cards. That would have been such  simple solve-for, in 2017 - 2018. Now it is more complicated. But still very easy, and yet STILL OSD is not interested in this approach. 

It's like the US does not really want to kill its enemy, just make it annoyed. Just pretend to defend agaisnt it. Not really immobalize it. 

_______________________________________

ASKING THE TOUGH QUESTIONS: MISSILE DEFENSE AND THE PANDEMIC: Because the wrong questions will kill us, or destroy us. Biomed acts like it has all the time in the world, to patiently work through FDA and test and refinement .. but meantime 500k dead in the US by Feb. And worldwide, such suffering. We act like we have time against NK or China or Iran .. but Iran killed 230+ on flight 752, incl. children. And we could have stopped that. And thousands of military are injured or killed each year, and we could stop that. And the first nuclear or icbm that gets through crap Patriot or Thaad will kill another 3 million. .. 

• HOW DID WE THINK NORTH KOREA OR CHINA OR IRAN WERE ATTACKING US, 2017 - 2019 before Beidou completed? 
• We owned the only navigational system in the world. No missile or jet or anything could leave the ground without uplink/downlink from US gps satellites, and then a ground station confirmation - right? 
• I showed the US Cabinet personally, and later a major DoD prime tried to support me in this - from 2017 to 2019, how to STOP ENEMY ACQUISITION OF US GPS SIGNALS. EFFECTIVELY STOPPING THEIR LAUNCH. And it was not with jamming. it was via precision identification of any enemy gps receiver card .. and then manipulation of that signal. SIMPLE. SIMPLE AI.  

No one wanted to do this, from the White House. So the US looked stupid, sending our Secretary of State over to 'negotiate' for N Korea to stop when  Kim himself knew we were freely giving him the free access to the satellite systems he needed to do anything. 

That's what our pandemic response is like too. It overlooks the obvious, and focuses instead on a vastly different, cumbersome response that will NEVER SOLVE THE REAL PROBLEM. NEVER PROTECT US. 

Infants and young children almost always have weaker immune systems than adults - they've not had a chance to build up Adaptive Immunity. Anyone with a young child knows how often they are sick their first 2 years. It is a 'myth' that children have stronger immune sytems. BUT THEY WERE / ARE IMMUNE FROM COVID-19. 

_____________

LET'S WALK THROUGH THE FACTS:

1. Few mothers would have had time to become exposed to Cov-19 and pass immunity to the child.

2. There was not enough time initially to acquire immunity to Cov-19, by survivors. 

3. The same populations are holding steady, in demographics (except in America) for immunity. So it is likely the same human mechanism  protecting them over time. Only INNATE Immunity fits this explanation or scenario, based on the limited facts we have now. 

E.g. patients consistently testing NEG to both Covid-19 virus and antibodies indicate that the ADAPTIVE immune system is NOT what is protecting them. 

T cell response is indicated, but in such situations, T cell response is managed and controlled by Innate triggers, such as Vitamin D. D regulates and supports and shuts on and off both Innate and Adaptive immunity and features of both sytems.

Or is more refined testing needed? We know there are other ways to defend against Cov-19 than antibodies, by now. Many of us never appear to produce antibodies. So -- this negates the entire principle of HOW we  test for Covid-19 infection or exposure, because such tests only look for antigen/antibodies specific to Covid-19. Neither tests nor researchers or our federal agencies  are  refined enough to look for ADDITIONAL INDICATORS OF INFECTION OR EXPOSURE - e.g. other subtle differences like elevated counts of elements in either Innate or Adaptive immunity alert status.

Like testing for gamma globulin levels, or other neutralizing antibodies, or elevated microphage or T-cell counts, etc)

• It doesn't fit the vaccine solution to the facts or indicators or clues of the pandemic. The same products that did not work before, or same high-risk approaches, are being funded again.
• It doesn't support any but the largest corporate efforts. Including smaller innovators like us, or some great products from a number of sources, that would make our airways toxic to covid-19 on the way in (ours) or on the way out (others) - to purify the air leaving us, and to act as a 'repellant' blocking attraction and activation further. 
• It doesn't treat the entire US or global response as a single large (BPO-type) program, and 'manage ' and divide funding and tasks and information sharing  accordingly - as with multiple task orders or projects.  
• It does not 'see' from a Big Picture, the end-to-end solution vision and put it together and aportion work or request R&D accordingly: e.g. Innate as well as  Adaptive response, smaller products as well as vaccine, etc. Instead, everyone  in the world practically is focused on  2 or 3  singular Adaptive immune responses or features. Whilst glaring issues - Innate Immunity - go unaddressed. 

95% of us - and almost everyone under age 40 - did not get sick from Covid-19 THE FIRST WEEK. AND THE NEXT 3 WEEKS OF EXPOSURE IN ANY GIVEN NATION. THAT IS THE OPPOSITE TO MEASELS, EBOLA, TB, OR OTHER DISEASES WHERE BABIES AND YOUTH ARE THE MOST VULNERABLE. 

Infants and young children almost always have weaker immune systems than adults - they've not had a chance to build up Adaptive Immunity. Anyone with a young child knows how often they are sick their first 2 years. It is a 'myth' that children have stronger immune sytems. BUT THEY WERE / ARE IMMUNE FROM COVID-19. 

_____________

LET'S WALK THROUGH THE FACTS:

1. Few mothers would have had time to become exposed to Cov-19 and pass immunity to the child.

2. There was not enough time initially to acquire immunity to Cov-19, by survivors. 

3. The same populations are holding steady, in demographics (except in America) for immunity. So it is likely the same human mechanism is protecting them over time. 

4. 

Take over the overall project mgt at a national level and run things like there is a sense of urgency, and coordinated national response. 

The agencies running things, or even the leadership in many instances, have no experience in global emergency operations, or coordination or even global program management. 

They don't see the whole. In either funding or R&D or insight coordination. They don't see what's missing -- like WHY ARE WE DEVELOPING VACCINES FOR SYSTEM B WHEN SYSTEM A IS STRONGLY INDICATED AS THE CAUSATIVE FACTOR AND WE ALREADY (OURS) HAVE A SOLUTION FOR SYSTEM A?

1. FIX OR STRENGTHEN THE INNATE IMMUNE SYSTEM THAT IS COMPROMISED BY COV-19, OR THAT IS COMPROMISED BY OUR GRADUAL LIFESTYLE CHANGES AND ALLOWING COVID-19 TO  FLOURISH.    THUS FAR WE HAVE IDENTIFIED LOW D AS THE CAUSATIVE FACTOR IN WEEK INNATE IMMUNITY.                                                                                  
                                                                                              
   -- Test and bring global D levels, or national D levels, up to optimum - 75% to 100%. Currently, most doctors say 30% is fine. it is not. US FDA and other nations differ strongly on what is acceptable for D levels, and safe doses .  US is far too low. (Australia allows 600,000 iu per shot, US only 200,000 iu). But FDA in a private conversation last week said that they were amenable to other national standards being used for a re-purposed solution.                                                                              --      This is an RX-only solution. You need the stronger levels. D is both a strong anti-viral and a very strong anti-inflammatory and overall immunity regulator, both Adaptive and Innate.                                                                                      --     Shots or IV take effect within 24 hours. Oral doses take up to 3 to 4 weeks. There are also patches that can be worn. Using algorithm to id the most likely high risk candidates, immediate dosing with existing supplies could begin, as longer term suppliers are produced. Those not high-risk (kids, teens,) could use oral supplements. Save the more expensive more concentrated doses for elderly, respirator wards, relief workers,nurses. etc.                                            
              
2. After this basic protection is put into place, use a low level of D as a backbone and lace onto it additional specialized Adaptive Immunity features or components for Phase II: e.g. nafamostat or camostat to defend against activation (TMPRSS2);  we 'borrowed' a Chinese Ace2 Inhibitor, and there are probably others floating about in secret, to prevent Attachment; D already limits viral RNA replication, when present in adequate levels, etc. 
3. Public education campaign to return to better nurtition and exercise norms - the average person has no D from October to May; and our average nutrition even in America is very low in D. We don't supplement as we used to. People don't go outdoors or get trips to the sun as Trump does, etc. 
4. Physician and national medical campaign to standardize Covid-19 treatment protocol, which is still all over the board:                              
   -- Dexamethasone (we pioneered this  re-purposing) and other steroids early on.               -- check ace inhibitor levels - **2 mil americans take these for hpb. below 25 mg they inhibit covid19. above 25 mg they inflame covid 19 damage to the heart. (we've said this since march. The media only yesterday realized covid19 even infects the heart.) there is no overall standardization of medical protocol and patients are confused about which symptoms can be covid, still.        
    -- GIVE PATIENTS THE CHOICE OF D ASAP, IN HOSPITAL NOW. This cut respirator deaths from 66% to 33%, et.c.

By Thanksgiving, existing supplies could start to be distributed. We have one German manufacturer already doing other cov-19 vaccine work, on tentative reserve. But that's only a few million. 

However, if there was a  real US focus on moving in this direction, or doing this step FIRST,  reserved NIH bandwidth could be redirected to concentrated D vaccine and iv: 600,000 iu+.